Git create branch instead of master code#
If you didn't like the article or you have an idea for improvement, please reach out to me on Twitter and drop me a DM with feedback so I can improve and provide better content in the future ?. The Test Branch and the Master Branch have diverged here and have different code the code from Test Branch can be merged with the Master branch using git merge. I am sharing some other tips, articles, and things I learn there.
If you enjoyed it and learned something new, support me by clicking the share button below to reach more people and/or give me a follow on Twitter where we can catch up. Thank you for reading this to the end ?. I don't recommend blindly use rebase to keep your feature branches up to date but for larger projects, my preference is to use rebase instead of merge. With it, we don't have to resolve the same conflict all over again. it can result in fixing the same conflict for every commit in the feature branch - for this one, I find really useful the git rerere configuration which is saving the resolved conflicts and then reusing them.we are losing the chronological order - IMO this is not a problem at all because we achieve a series of intentional changes that are made to master branch.it can be confusing for less experienced Git users.There are a couple of things to keep in mind though: ability to easily change our feature branch history.long tramlines from long-lived feature branches.making the history in our master branch much easier to follow because it is linear.